home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=92TT0869>
- <title>
- Apr. 20, 1992: Want to See Some Secret Pictures?
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
- Apr. 20, 1992 Why Voters Don't Trust Clinton
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- CULTURE, Page 87
- Want to See Some Secret Pictures?
- </hdr><body>
- <p>Traditionalists spar with a new leadership over how public the
- fabled Barnes collection should be
- </p>
- <p>By Daniel S. Levy/Merion Station
- </p>
- <p> In an era of blockbuster traveling exhibitions,
- mass-merchandising museum shops and high-profile curatorial
- politics, the Barnes Foundation, housed in a limestone mansion
- in suburban Philadelphia, is one of the most striking--and
- perplexing--anomalies of the international art world. It is
- the repository of a fabled collection of Impressionist and
- Postimpressionist works (180 Renoirs, 69 Cezannes, 44 Picassos
- and numerous Seurats, Gauguins and Modiglianis). Yet because of
- the harshly restrictive policies of its embittered
- founder-patron, the Barnes has largely withheld its treasures
- from public view.
- </p>
- <p> Dr. Albert Barnes, a Philadelphia physician who made
- millions from an antiseptic he invented and marketed in 1901,
- had a Medici-like eye for art. But his taste shocked the blue
- bloods of his day, who scorned him--and earned his unrelenting
- enmity in return. At his death in 1951, he directed that no
- picture from his collection could be loaned, sold, reproduced
- or even moved from its position on the wall. Future control of
- the foundation, he decreed, would be in the hands of trustees
- appointed by Lincoln University, a small black college in
- Lincoln University, Pa. Since then, alumni of the school he
- founded in 1922, which replaced factual art history with a
- proto-New Age veneration of beauty, have increasingly formed a
- fiercely loyal and protective cult.
- </p>
- <p> The foundation denied the public access to the collection
- until a Pennsylvania judge in 1960 forced open the doors for 2
- 1/2 days a week. Now the trustees, led by Richard Glanton, a
- Philadelphia attorney who is general counsel for Lincoln
- University and the Barnes' new president, are trying to break
- the hold of tradition further and, as they see it, move the
- Barnes into the 21st century.
- </p>
- <p> They need court approval to alter the trust, so they have
- asked for permission to extend gallery hours, increase the
- admission charge and reinvest the foundation's $10 million trust
- fund. Security must be beefed up, they say, and the antiquated
- galleries need climate controls, new lighting and fire
- protection. While those renovations are in progress, the
- collection would be removed to an undecided location. Most
- radical of all, the trustees are proposing a traveling show of
- 80 Barnes paintings (possibly among them: Matisse's The Joy of
- Life and Cezanne's The Card Player) that would go to
- Washington's National Gallery and abroad, from which they hope
- to raise $7 million.
- </p>
- <p> The reaction of old-line Barnes adherents to all this can
- be described in one word: horror. "It would be a tragedy," says
- Rich ard Segal, a former teacher at the Barnes. "To break apart
- such a collection would be like taking a masterpiece by
- Rembrandt and cutting off a corner of it and selling it." The
- traditionalists charge that the trustees' plans will subject the
- paintings to too much wear and possible damage. They also fear
- that the Barnes education program is being diluted, if not
- dismantled.
- </p>
- <p> A counterattack has focused on another of the trustees'
- moves, the signing of a $700,000 deal with Knopf to publish two
- coffee-table books about the collection. The DeMazia Trust,
- founded by one of Barnes' compatriots, has gone to court to
- challenge the book contract, which coincided with a $2 million
- donation to Lincoln University from the Samuel I. Newhouse
- Foundation. One of the heads of the foundation, Samuel Newhouse
- Jr., is also chairman of Knopf's parent company. Glanton says
- any suggestion of a link is "outrageous" since it "ignores the
- fact the ((Knopf)) proposal was the best proposal." Yet other
- publishers say they were denied a chance to bid properly on the
- books. "From the day I sent ((Glanton)) our proposal letter, I
- never heard from him," says Paul Gottlieb, president of Abrams
- books. "We were closed out."
- </p>
- <p> Glanton, 45, who has no art background, appears to have
- moved aggressively to enforce his policies, which he insists are
- intended to ensure "that Dr. Barnes' true intent is actually
- realized." Several opponents of his changes have left the
- foundation or been dismissed within the past year. Segal claims
- he was fired from his teaching post last June after he objected
- to a trustees' plan--since withdrawn--to sell 15 paintings.
- Nick Tinari, one of three students with standing in the court
- to represent student interests, was expelled in January.
- Conservator Wendy Hartman Samet was dismissed a few days later,
- and the following month education director Esther Van Sant
- resigned, saying she was "forced out."
- </p>
- <p> The outcome of the Barnes struggle could have wide
- implications in the art world. Collectors are watching to see
- if later generations will be able to alter their dying wishes,
- and museums are wondering if their future plans can be held back
- by a hand reaching up from the grave. Both questions may be
- answered when the court decides whose version of Barnes' vision
- will prevail.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-